1958 Austin A 35 vs. 2002 Bristol Blenheim
To start off, 2002 Bristol Blenheim is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Austin A 35. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Austin A 35 would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Bristol Blenheim (351 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 317 more horse power than 1958 Austin A 35. (34 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Bristol Blenheim should accelerate faster than 1958 Austin A 35. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Bristol Blenheim weights approximately 1050 kg more than 1958 Austin A 35. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Bristol Blenheim (500 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 432 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Austin A 35. (68 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2002 Bristol Blenheim will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Austin A 35.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Austin A 35 | 2002 Bristol Blenheim | |
| Make | Austin | Bristol |
| Model | A 35 | Blenheim |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 948 cc | 5898 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 351 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 68 Nm | 500 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 690 kg | 1740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3470 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2910 mm |
