1958 Austin A 35 vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Austin A 35. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Austin A 35 would be higher. At 2,343 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander (162 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 1958 Austin A 35. (34 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1958 Austin A 35. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 780 kg more than 1958 Austin A 35. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander (215 Nm) has 147 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Austin A 35. (68 Nm). This means 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Austin A 35.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Austin A 35 | 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Make | Austin | Mitsubishi |
Model | A 35 | Outlander |
Year Released | 1958 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 948 cc | 2343 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 162 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 68 Nm | 215 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 62.9 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 100 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 690 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3470 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 59 L |