1958 Austin A 35 vs. 2010 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2010 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Austin A 35. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Austin A 35 would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jeep Wrangler (205 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 171 more horse power than 1958 Austin A 35. (34 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1958 Austin A 35. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 1314 kg more than 1958 Austin A 35. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jeep Wrangler (325 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 257 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Austin A 35. (68 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2010 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Austin A 35.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Austin A 35 | 2010 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Austin | Jeep |
Model | A 35 | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1958 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 948 cc | 3800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 205 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 68 Nm | 325 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 690 kg | 2004 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3470 mm | 4684 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 2103 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2946 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 82 L |