1958 Austin A 35 vs. 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Austin A 35. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Austin A 35 would be higher. At 2,987 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee (187 HP) has 153 more horse power than 1958 Austin A 35. (34 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1958 Austin A 35.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee (320 Nm) has 252 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Austin A 35. (68 Nm). This means 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Austin A 35.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Austin A 35 | 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | Austin | Jeep |
| Model | A 35 | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 948 cc | 2987 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 187 HP |
| Torque | 68 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3470 mm | 4859 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1958 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1755 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2916 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 80 L |
