1958 Austin A 35 vs. 2012 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2012 Toyota Tundra is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Austin A 35. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Austin A 35 would be higher. At 5,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Toyota Tundra (381 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 347 more horse power than 1958 Austin A 35. (34 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1958 Austin A 35. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 640 kg more than 1958 Austin A 35. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Toyota Tundra (544 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 476 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Austin A 35. (68 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2012 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Austin A 35.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Austin A 35 | 2012 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Austin | Toyota |
| Model | A 35 | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 948 cc | 5663 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 381 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 68 Nm | 544 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 690 kg | 1330 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3470 mm | 5820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1940 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 3710 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 100 L |
