1958 Austin A 35 vs. 2013 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Austin A 35. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Austin A 35 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro (572 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 538 more horse power than 1958 Austin A 35. (34 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1958 Austin A 35.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro (754 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 686 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Austin A 35. (68 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2013 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Austin A 35.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Austin A 35 | 2013 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | A 35 | Camaro |
Year Released | 1958 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 948 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 572 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 68 Nm | 754 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 62.9 mm | 103 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 92 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3470 mm | 4836 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1918 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1377 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2852 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 72 L |