1958 Austin A 35 vs. 2013 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2013 Jeep Compass is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Austin A 35. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Austin A 35 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jeep Compass (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 1958 Austin A 35. (34 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 1958 Austin A 35. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jeep Compass weights approximately 830 kg more than 1958 Austin A 35. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jeep Compass (224 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Austin A 35. (68 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2013 Jeep Compass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Austin A 35.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Austin A 35 | 2013 Jeep Compass | |
Make | Austin | Jeep |
Model | A 35 | Compass |
Year Released | 1958 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 948 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 68 Nm | 224 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 62.9 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 97 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 690 kg | 1520 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3470 mm | 4448 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1811 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1651 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2634 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 51 L |