1958 Austin A 40 vs. 1967 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1967 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1967 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1958 Austin A 40. (35 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1958 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 179 kg more than 1958 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Mazda Cosmo (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Austin A 40. (68 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1967 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Austin A 40 | 1967 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Austin | Mazda |
| Model | A 40 | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 948 cc | 1964 cc |
| Horse Power | 35 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 68 Nm | 133 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 761 kg | 940 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1170 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2130 mm | 2210 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 57 L |
