1958 Austin A 40 vs. 1976 Nissan 240 C
To start off, 1976 Nissan 240 C is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,982 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Nissan 240 C is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Nissan 240 C weights approximately 499 kg more than 1958 Austin A 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Austin A 40 | 1976 Nissan 240 C | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | A 40 | 240 C |
Year Released | 1958 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 948 cc | 1982 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 761 kg | 1260 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2130 mm | 2700 mm |