1958 Austin A 40 vs. 1985 Buick Skyhawk
To start off, 1985 Buick Skyhawk is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Buick Skyhawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Buick Skyhawk (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1958 Austin A 40. (35 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1985 Buick Skyhawk should accelerate faster than 1958 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Buick Skyhawk weights approximately 325 kg more than 1958 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1958 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Austin A 40 | 1985 Buick Skyhawk | |
Make | Austin | Buick |
Model | A 40 | Skyhawk |
Year Released | 1958 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 948 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 761 kg | 1086 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2130 mm | 2580 mm |