1958 Austin A 40 vs. 2005 Chevrolet Blazer
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer (191 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 156 more horse power than 1958 Austin A 40. (35 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer should accelerate faster than 1958 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 923 kg more than 1958 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer (339 Nm) has 271 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Austin A 40. (68 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Austin A 40 | 2005 Chevrolet Blazer | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | A 40 | Blazer |
Year Released | 1958 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 948 cc | 4294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 191 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 68 Nm | 339 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 62.9 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.2:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 761 kg | 1684 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2130 mm | 2560 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 72 L |