1958 Austin A 95 vs. 1941 Cadillac 61
To start off, 1958 Austin A 95 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Cadillac 61. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Cadillac 61 would be higher. At 5,276 cc (8 cylinders), 1941 Cadillac 61 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1941 Cadillac 61 (124 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1958 Austin A 95. (92 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1941 Cadillac 61 should accelerate faster than 1958 Austin A 95. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1941 Cadillac 61 weights approximately 544 kg more than 1958 Austin A 95. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Austin A 95 | 1941 Cadillac 61 | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | A 95 | 61 |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1941 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2639 cc | 5276 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 92 HP | 124 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1356 kg | 1900 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3280 mm |
