1958 Austin A 95 vs. 1954 BMW 340
To start off, 1958 Austin A 95 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 BMW 340 would be higher. At 2,639 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Austin A 95 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Austin A 95 (92 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1954 BMW 340. (53 HP @ 3750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Austin A 95 should accelerate faster than 1954 BMW 340. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Austin A 95 weights approximately 106 kg more than 1954 BMW 340. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Austin A 95 | 1954 BMW 340 | |
Make | Austin | BMW |
Model | A 95 | 340 |
Year Released | 1958 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2639 cc | 1971 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 92 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1356 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2880 mm |