1958 Austin A 95 vs. 1959 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1959 Cadillac 62 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Austin A 95. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Austin A 95 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1958 Austin A 95. (92 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1958 Austin A 95. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 769 kg more than 1958 Austin A 95. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 1958 Austin A 95 has manual transmission. 1958 Austin A 95 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Austin A 95 | 1959 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | A 95 | 62 |
Year Released | 1958 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2639 cc | 6382 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 92 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1356 kg | 2125 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 5730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 2040 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 79 L |