1958 Austin A 95 vs. 1961 Saab 750
To start off, 1961 Saab 750 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Austin A 95. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Austin A 95 would be higher. At 2,639 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Austin A 95 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Austin A 95 (92 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1961 Saab 750. (48 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Austin A 95 should accelerate faster than 1961 Saab 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Austin A 95 weights approximately 503 kg more than 1961 Saab 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1958 Austin A 95 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Austin A 95. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1961 Saab 750, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1958 Austin A 95 (176 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Saab 750. (84 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1958 Austin A 95 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Saab 750.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Austin A 95 | 1961 Saab 750 | |
Make | Austin | Saab |
Model | A 95 | 750 |
Year Released | 1958 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2639 cc | 748 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 92 HP | 48 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 84 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79.4 mm | 66 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 72.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1356 kg | 853 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 60 L |