1958 Austin A 95 vs. 1967 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1967 Nissan Cedric is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Austin A 95. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Austin A 95 would be higher. At 2,639 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Austin A 95 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Austin A 95 (92 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (66 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Austin A 95 should accelerate faster than 1967 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Austin A 95 weights approximately 36 kg more than 1967 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1958 Austin A 95 (176 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (146 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 1958 Austin A 95 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Austin A 95 | 1967 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | A 95 | Cedric |
Year Released | 1958 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2639 cc | 2164 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 92 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 146 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Vehicle Weight | 1356 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2700 mm |