1958 Austin A 95 vs. 1974 BMW 1502
To start off, 1974 BMW 1502 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Austin A 95. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Austin A 95 would be higher. At 2,639 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Austin A 95 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Austin A 95 (92 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1974 BMW 1502. (83 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Austin A 95 should accelerate faster than 1974 BMW 1502. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Austin A 95 weights approximately 426 kg more than 1974 BMW 1502. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1958 Austin A 95 (176 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 BMW 1502. (130 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1958 Austin A 95 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 BMW 1502.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Austin A 95 | 1974 BMW 1502 | |
Make | Austin | BMW |
Model | A 95 | 1502 |
Year Released | 1958 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2639 cc | 1574 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 92 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 130 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79.4 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 71 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 8.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1356 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 50 L |