1958 Austin A 95 vs. 1979 Dodge Omni
To start off, 1979 Dodge Omni is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Austin A 95. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Austin A 95 would be higher. At 2,639 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Austin A 95 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Austin A 95 weights approximately 360 kg more than 1979 Dodge Omni.
Because 1958 Austin A 95 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Austin A 95. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Dodge Omni, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Austin A 95 | 1979 Dodge Omni | |
| Make | Austin | Dodge |
| Model | A 95 | Omni |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2639 cc | 1716 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 92 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1356 kg | 996 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2530 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 49 L |
