1958 Austin A 95 vs. 2002 Toyota ES 3
To start off, 2002 Toyota ES 3 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Austin A 95. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Austin A 95 would be higher. At 2,639 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Austin A 95 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Austin A 95 weights approximately 656 kg more than 2002 Toyota ES 3.
Because 1958 Austin A 95 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Austin A 95. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Toyota ES 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Austin A 95 | 2002 Toyota ES 3 | |
Make | Austin | Toyota |
Model | A 95 | ES 3 |
Year Released | 1958 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2639 cc | 1364 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 92 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1356 kg | 700 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 3530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2320 mm |