1958 Austin A 95 vs. 2003 MCC Smart

To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Austin A 95. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Austin A 95 would be higher. At 2,639 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Austin A 95 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MCC Smart (106 HP) has 14 more horse power than 1958 Austin A 95. (92 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 1958 Austin A 95. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Austin A 95 weights approximately 381 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart.

Because 1958 Austin A 95 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Austin A 95. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1958 Austin A 95 (176 Nm) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Smart. (145 Nm). This means 1958 Austin A 95 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Smart. 2003 MCC Smart has automatic transmission and 1958 Austin A 95 has manual transmission. 1958 Austin A 95 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 MCC Smart will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1958 Austin A 95 2003 MCC Smart
Make Austin MCC
Model A 95 Smart
Year Released 1958 2003
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2639 cc 1499 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 92 HP 106 HP
Torque 176 Nm 145 Nm
Engine Bore Size 79.4 mm 75 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88.9 mm 84.8 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.3:1 10.5:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1356 kg 975 kg
Vehicle Length 4600 mm 3760 mm
Vehicle Width 1630 mm 1690 mm
Vehicle Height 1580 mm 1460 mm
Wheelbase Size 2690 mm 2510 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 72 L 47 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]