1958 Austin A 95 vs. 2004 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2004 Mazda Tribute is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Austin A 95. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Austin A 95 would be higher. At 2,639 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Austin A 95 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda Tribute (130 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1958 Austin A 95. (92 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1958 Austin A 95. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 30 kg more than 1958 Austin A 95. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda Tribute (183 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Austin A 95. (176 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda Tribute will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Austin A 95.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Austin A 95 | 2004 Mazda Tribute | |
Make | Austin | Mazda |
Model | A 95 | Tribute |
Year Released | 1958 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2639 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 92 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 183 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 79.4 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.6:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1356 kg | 1386 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 62 L |