1958 Austin A 95 vs. 2007 Proton Savvy
To start off, 2007 Proton Savvy is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Austin A 95. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Austin A 95 would be higher. At 2,639 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Austin A 95 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Austin A 95 (92 HP) has 18 more horse power than 2007 Proton Savvy. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Austin A 95 should accelerate faster than 2007 Proton Savvy. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Austin A 95 weights approximately 411 kg more than 2007 Proton Savvy. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1958 Austin A 95 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Austin A 95. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Proton Savvy, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1958 Austin A 95 (176 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Proton Savvy. (105 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1958 Austin A 95 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Proton Savvy. 2007 Proton Savvy has automatic transmission and 1958 Austin A 95 has manual transmission. 1958 Austin A 95 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Proton Savvy will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Austin A 95 | 2007 Proton Savvy | |
| Make | Austin | Proton |
| Model | A 95 | Savvy |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2007 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2639 cc | 1149 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 92 HP | 74 HP |
| Torque | 176 Nm | 105 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 79.4 mm | 69.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 76.8 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1356 kg | 945 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 3720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2400 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 40 L |
