1958 Austin A 95 vs. 2008 Nissan Livina
To start off, 2008 Nissan Livina is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Austin A 95. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Austin A 95 would be higher. At 2,639 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Austin A 95 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan Livina weights approximately 1049 kg more than 1958 Austin A 95.
Because 1958 Austin A 95 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Austin A 95. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Livina, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1958 Austin A 95 (176 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Nissan Livina. (153 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1958 Austin A 95 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Nissan Livina.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Austin A 95 | 2008 Nissan Livina | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | A 95 | Livina |
Year Released | 1958 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2639 cc | 1598 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 92 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 176 Nm | 153 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1356 kg | 2405 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 52 L |