1958 Austin A 95 vs. 2011 Holden UTE
To start off, 2011 Holden UTE is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Austin A 95. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Austin A 95 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden UTE (281 HP) has 189 more horse power than 1958 Austin A 95. (92 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1958 Austin A 95.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden UTE (350 Nm) has 174 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Austin A 95. (176 Nm). This means 2011 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Austin A 95.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Austin A 95 | 2011 Holden UTE | |
Make | Austin | Holden |
Model | A 95 | UTE |
Year Released | 1958 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2639 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 92 HP | 281 HP |
Torque | 176 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |