1958 Austin A135 vs. 1946 Maserati 6C
To start off, 1958 Austin A135 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Maserati 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Maserati 6C would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Austin A135 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Austin A135 weights approximately 1276 kg more than 1946 Maserati 6C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Austin A135 | 1946 Maserati 6C | |
| Make | Austin | Maserati |
| Model | A135 | 6C |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1946 |
| Engine Size | 3993 cc | 1493 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 2080 kg | 804 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3100 mm | 2560 mm |
