1958 Austin A135 vs. 1970 Chevrolet C-10
To start off, 1970 Chevrolet C-10 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Austin A135. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Austin A135 would be higher. In terms of performance, 1970 Chevrolet C-10 (250 HP) has 100 more horse power than 1958 Austin A135. (150 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Chevrolet C-10 should accelerate faster than 1958 Austin A135.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1970 Chevrolet C-10 has automatic transmission and 1958 Austin A135 has manual transmission. 1958 Austin A135 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1970 Chevrolet C-10 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Austin A135 | 1970 Chevrolet C-10 | |
| Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
| Model | A135 | C-10 |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 250 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
