1958 Austin A135 vs. 1981 Dodge Omni
To start off, 1981 Dodge Omni is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Austin A135. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Austin A135 would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Austin A135 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Austin A135 weights approximately 1085 kg more than 1981 Dodge Omni.
Because 1958 Austin A135 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Austin A135. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Dodge Omni, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Austin A135 | 1981 Dodge Omni | |
Make | Austin | Dodge |
Model | A135 | Omni |
Year Released | 1958 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3993 cc | 1716 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2080 kg | 995 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3100 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 49 L |