1958 Austin A135 vs. 1986 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 1986 Cadillac Brougham is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Austin A135. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Austin A135 would be higher. At 5,030 cc (8 cylinders), 1986 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Austin A135 weights approximately 130 kg more than 1986 Cadillac Brougham.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Austin A135 | 1986 Cadillac Brougham | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | A135 | Brougham |
Year Released | 1958 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3993 cc | 5030 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2080 kg | 1950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 5630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3100 mm | 3090 mm |