1958 Austin A135 vs. 1986 Chrysler Le Baron
To start off, 1986 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Austin A135. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Austin A135 would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Austin A135 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Austin A135 weights approximately 880 kg more than 1986 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 1958 Austin A135 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Austin A135. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Austin A135 | 1986 Chrysler Le Baron | |
| Make | Austin | Chrysler |
| Model | A135 | Le Baron |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3993 cc | 2212 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2080 kg | 1200 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4570 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3100 mm | 2560 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 53 L |
