1958 Austin A135 vs. 2002 Mitsubishi Minica
To start off, 2002 Mitsubishi Minica is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Austin A135. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Austin A135 would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Austin A135 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Austin A135 weights approximately 1370 kg more than 2002 Mitsubishi Minica.
Because 2002 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 Austin A135. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Austin A135 | 2002 Mitsubishi Minica | |
Make | Austin | Mitsubishi |
Model | A135 | Minica |
Year Released | 1958 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3993 cc | 657 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 2080 kg | 710 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3100 mm | 2350 mm |