1958 Austin A135 vs. 2008 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2008 Toyota Condor is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Austin A135. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Austin A135 would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Austin A135 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Austin A135 weights approximately 368 kg more than 2008 Toyota Condor.
Because 2008 Toyota Condor is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 Austin A135. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Toyota Condor will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1958 Austin A135 (308 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Toyota Condor. (192 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1958 Austin A135 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Toyota Condor.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Austin A135 | 2008 Toyota Condor | |
Make | Austin | Toyota |
Model | A135 | Condor |
Year Released | 1958 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3993 cc | 2986 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 308 Nm | 192 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.3 mm | 99.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 111.1 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.6:1 | 22.2:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2080 kg | 1712 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 5020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3100 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 70 L |