1958 Austin A135 vs. 2013 Mini Cooper
To start off, 2013 Mini Cooper is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Austin A135. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Austin A135 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Austin A135 weights approximately 815 kg more than 2013 Mini Cooper.
Because 1958 Austin A135 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Austin A135. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Cooper, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1958 Austin A135 (308 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Cooper. (160 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1958 Austin A135 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Cooper.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Austin A135 | 2013 Mini Cooper | |
Make | Austin | Mini |
Model | A135 | Cooper |
Year Released | 1958 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 4100 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 308 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.3 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 111.1 mm | 85 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2080 kg | 1265 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 3961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1426 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3100 mm | 2547 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 50 L |