1958 Austin-Healey 100 vs. 1964 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1964 Nissan Cedric is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Austin-Healey 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Austin-Healey 100 would be higher. At 2,639 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Austin-Healey 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Austin-Healey 100 (101 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1964 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Austin-Healey 100 should accelerate faster than 1964 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Austin-Healey 100 weights approximately 35 kg more than 1964 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1958 Austin-Healey 100 (142 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1958 Austin-Healey 100 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Austin-Healey 100 | 1964 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Nissan |
Model | 100 | Cedric |
Year Released | 1958 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2639 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 142 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1085 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2540 mm |