1958 Austin-Healey 100 vs. 1967 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 1967 Ford Fairlane is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Austin-Healey 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Austin-Healey 100 would be higher. At 3,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Ford Fairlane (122 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1958 Austin-Healey 100. (101 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1958 Austin-Healey 100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 190 kg more than 1958 Austin-Healey 100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Austin-Healey 100 | 1967 Ford Fairlane | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Ford |
| Model | 100 | Fairlane |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2639 cc | 3930 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 101 HP | 122 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1310 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 5110 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2960 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 68 L |
