1958 Austin-Healey 100 vs. 1972 Chrysler 160
To start off, 1972 Chrysler 160 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Austin-Healey 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Austin-Healey 100 would be higher. At 2,639 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Austin-Healey 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Austin-Healey 100 (101 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1972 Chrysler 160. (79 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Austin-Healey 100 should accelerate faster than 1972 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Austin-Healey 100 weights approximately 52 kg more than 1972 Chrysler 160. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1958 Austin-Healey 100 (142 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Chrysler 160. (125 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1958 Austin-Healey 100 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Austin-Healey 100 | 1972 Chrysler 160 | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Chrysler |
Model | 100 | 160 |
Year Released | 1958 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2639 cc | 1639 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 142 Nm | 125 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1068 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2680 mm |