1958 Austin-Healey 100 vs. 2000 Citroen C2
To start off, 2000 Citroen C2 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Austin-Healey 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Austin-Healey 100 would be higher. At 2,639 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Austin-Healey 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Citroen C2 (108 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1958 Austin-Healey 100. (101 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Citroen C2 should accelerate faster than 1958 Austin-Healey 100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Austin-Healey 100 weights approximately 65 kg more than 2000 Citroen C2.
Let's talk about torque, 1958 Austin-Healey 100 (142 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Citroen C2. (120 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1958 Austin-Healey 100 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Citroen C2.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Austin-Healey 100 | 2000 Citroen C2 | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Citroen |
Model | 100 | C2 |
Year Released | 1958 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2639 cc | 1587 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 142 Nm | 120 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1055 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 41 L |