1958 Austin-Healey 100 vs. 2000 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2000 Ford Mustang is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Austin-Healey 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Austin-Healey 100 would be higher. At 5,409 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Mustang (385 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 284 more horse power than 1958 Austin-Healey 100. (101 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1958 Austin-Healey 100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Mustang weights approximately 508 kg more than 1958 Austin-Healey 100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Mustang (522 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 380 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Austin-Healey 100. (142 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2000 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Austin-Healey 100.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Austin-Healey 100 | 2000 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Ford |
Model | 100 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1958 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2639 cc | 5409 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 385 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 142 Nm | 522 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79.4 mm | 90.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 105.8 mm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1628 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 75 L |