1958 Austin-Healey 100 vs. 2002 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2002 Dodge Ram is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Austin-Healey 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Austin-Healey 100 would be higher. At 5,212 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Dodge Ram (220 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1958 Austin-Healey 100. (101 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1958 Austin-Healey 100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Dodge Ram weights approximately 759 kg more than 1958 Austin-Healey 100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Dodge Ram (408 Nm) has 266 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Austin-Healey 100. (142 Nm). This means 2002 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Austin-Healey 100.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Austin-Healey 100 | 2002 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Dodge |
Model | 100 | Ram |
Year Released | 1958 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2639 cc | 5212 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 142 Nm | 408 Nm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 6 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1879 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 5700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 3530 mm |