1958 Austin-Healey 100 vs. 2008 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2008 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Austin-Healey 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Austin-Healey 100 would be higher. At 2,639 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Austin-Healey 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Nissan X-Trail (112 HP @ 2000 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1958 Austin-Healey 100. (101 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1958 Austin-Healey 100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 480 kg more than 1958 Austin-Healey 100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Nissan X-Trail (270 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Austin-Healey 100. (142 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2008 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Austin-Healey 100.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Austin-Healey 100 | 2008 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Nissan |
Model | 100 | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1958 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2639 cc | 2184 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 112 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Torque | 142 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 60 L |