1958 Austin-Healey 100 vs. 2010 Chevrolet Suburban
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Suburban is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Austin-Healey 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Austin-Healey 100 would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Suburban is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Suburban (320 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 219 more horse power than 1958 Austin-Healey 100. (101 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Suburban should accelerate faster than 1958 Austin-Healey 100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Suburban weights approximately 1423 kg more than 1958 Austin-Healey 100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chevrolet Suburban (454 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 312 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Austin-Healey 100. (142 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2010 Chevrolet Suburban will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Austin-Healey 100.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Austin-Healey 100 | 2010 Chevrolet Suburban | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Chevrolet |
Model | 100 | Suburban |
Year Released | 1958 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2639 cc | 5300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 320 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 142 Nm | 454 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 2543 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 5649 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 2009 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1951 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 3302 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 117 L |