1958 Austin-Healey 100 vs. 2010 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Austin-Healey 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Austin-Healey 100 would be higher. At 2,639 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Austin-Healey 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1958 Austin-Healey 100. (101 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 1958 Austin-Healey 100.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser (232 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Austin-Healey 100. (142 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2010 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Austin-Healey 100.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Austin-Healey 100 | 2010 Citroen C-Crosser | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Citroen |
| Model | 100 | C-Crosser |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2639 cc | 2359 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 101 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 142 Nm | 232 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4100 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 79.4 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 87 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
