1958 Austin-Healey 100 vs. 2010 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2010 Toyota Camry is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Austin-Healey 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Austin-Healey 100 would be higher. At 2,639 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Austin-Healey 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota Camry (187 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1958 Austin-Healey 100. (101 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Camry should accelerate faster than 1958 Austin-Healey 100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Toyota Camry weights approximately 549 kg more than 1958 Austin-Healey 100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Austin-Healey 100 | 2010 Toyota Camry | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Toyota |
| Model | 100 | Camry |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2639 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 101 HP | 187 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1669 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4806 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1821 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1471 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2776 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 65 L |
