1958 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible vs. 2003 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible would be higher. At 3,501 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu (200 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1958 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. (105 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1958 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 54 kg more than 1958 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chevrolet Malibu (299 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 109 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. (190 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2003 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible | 2003 Chevrolet Malibu | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Chevrolet |
Model | Sports Convertible | Malibu |
Year Released | 1958 | 2003 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Size | 2991 cc | 3501 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 299 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 1504 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2810 mm |