1958 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible vs. 2011 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2011 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Jeep Wrangler (202 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1958 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. (105 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1958 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 486 kg more than 1958 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Jeep Wrangler (321 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. (190 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2011 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible | 2011 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Jeep |
Model | Sports Convertible | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1958 | 2011 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Size | 2991 cc | 3800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 321 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 1936 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4404 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1877 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2946 mm |