1958 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible vs. 2013 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XF is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible would be higher. At 2,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XF (335 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 230 more horse power than 1958 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. (105 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1958 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar XF weights approximately 319 kg more than 1958 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jaguar XF (340 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. (190 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2013 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible | 2013 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Jaguar |
Model | Sports Convertible | XF |
Year Released | 1958 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Size | 2991 cc | 2995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 335 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 340 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 1769 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2053 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2909 mm |