1958 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 2003 Renault Megane
To start off, 2003 Renault Megane is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Megane (134 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1958 Austin-Healey Sprite. (44 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1958 Austin-Healey Sprite.
Because 1958 Austin-Healey Sprite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Austin-Healey Sprite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Renault Megane (188 Nm) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Austin-Healey Sprite. (71 Nm). This means 2003 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Austin-Healey Sprite.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Austin-Healey Sprite | 2003 Renault Megane | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Renault |
Model | Sprite | Megane |
Year Released | 1958 | 2003 |
Body Type | Roadster | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 948 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 71 Nm | 188 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2690 mm |