1958 Austin Princess vs. 1970 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 1970 Cadillac Brougham is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Austin Princess would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Cadillac Brougham (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 1958 Austin Princess. (119 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 1958 Austin Princess. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 16 kg more than 1958 Austin Princess. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Austin Princess | 1970 Cadillac Brougham | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | Princess | Brougham |
Year Released | 1958 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3993 cc | 7734 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 228 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 2196 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 5810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 2040 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3360 mm | 3390 mm |