1958 Austin Princess vs. 1989 Mercury Sable
To start off, 1989 Mercury Sable is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Austin Princess would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Austin Princess weights approximately 780 kg more than 1989 Mercury Sable.
Because 1958 Austin Princess is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Austin Princess. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Mercury Sable, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Austin Princess | 1989 Mercury Sable | |
| Make | Austin | Mercury |
| Model | Princess | Sable |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1989 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3993 cc | 2513 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 119 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 1400 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3360 mm | 2700 mm |
