1958 Austin Princess vs. 1996 Mahindra Armada
To start off, 1996 Mahindra Armada is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Austin Princess would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Austin Princess (119 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1996 Mahindra Armada. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Austin Princess should accelerate faster than 1996 Mahindra Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Austin Princess weights approximately 180 kg more than 1996 Mahindra Armada. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1996 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 Austin Princess. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Austin Princess | 1996 Mahindra Armada | |
| Make | Austin | Mahindra |
| Model | Princess | Armada |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3993 cc | 2299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 119 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 2000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 4310 mm |
