1958 Austin Princess vs. 2004 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2004 Jaguar XK is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Austin Princess would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jaguar XK (294 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 175 more horse power than 1958 Austin Princess. (119 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1958 Austin Princess. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Austin Princess weights approximately 375 kg more than 2004 Jaguar XK.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jaguar XK (411 Nm) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Austin Princess. (251 Nm). This means 2004 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Austin Princess.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Austin Princess | 2004 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Austin | Jaguar |
Model | Princess | XK |
Year Released | 1958 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3993 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 294 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 411 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 1805 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3360 mm | 2590 mm |